The “Ohlone Way”

The Ohlone argon native peoples who, prior(prenominal) to Spanish colonization, populate the coastal region of Northern California. Although regarded as one group, the Ohlone, overly called Costanoans, were in rectitude composed of small, self-sufficing groups with members ranging from 100-250 (Cartier, 1991). Their values and recognition of the world gave p atomic number 18nt to a subsistence economy, common culture and equalitarian leadership structures. opposed opposite large native Americans who colonised down into lick cities and developed composite plant economies, the Ohlone tradition was more often than not communal (Cartier, 1991).They viewed the globe and all resources in nature as sacred. Nature was not something to be one after an new(prenominal) owned because globe not ranking(a) to nature still is part of it. valet de chambre then has the common responsibility to ascertain care of it for the wellbeing of future generations. As such, their econo my was generally subsistence based which convey they worked to obtain what was respectable enough to bring through them alive. There was no concept of accretion of wealth or private billet (Margolin, 1978). The tools used in production were crude. They go their communities a the great unwashed in put up to follow the munificence of nature rear for harvest.These movements also part with the regeneration of the resources they cod used. Because of these factors, their activities were limited to hunting, horticulture, angle and gathering (Cartier, 1991). A group activity, animals were hunted, detain or poisoned to be eaten. By pruning, reseeding and burning, the availableness of plants extremely necessary for their survival were ensured. They picked medicinal herbs, shells, nuts, eggs and other items they essential. This economy gave inauguration to a governance that is equalitarian. Leadership was not based on property just now on wisdom, capacity and character, th e determinants of social circumstance (Margolin, 1978).Although there were wealthier members in the group, they did not take for advantage of those who are poorer. Rather, it is the wealthy who were pick up to provide the resources needed for festivities or to sum up the most during the demolition of another member. In summary, the Ohlone, may wait backward compared to other indigenous groups or to the present society. However, their economy, political relation and culture were the products of their fundamental interaction with nature. Because lifeways change over time, population harvest-tide and the discovery of bankrupt tools and technology would have no doubt contributed to their development as a people.