A Rhetorical Analysis of James Ladsen and Joseph Epstein Essay

A Rhetorical Analysis of James Ladsen and Joseph Epstein - prove ExampleThe essay A Rhetorical Analysis of James Ladsen and Joseph Epstein talks about the hubris that can be defined as tempting to face, or otherwise thumbing superstars nose at that which is already predetermined. This ancient Greek term for insolence and arrogance to fate plays a powerful role with honor to the way how current culture is defined and practiced. Essentially, the culture that exists within the United States, and to a large fictional character around the globe as a result of globalization, can be understood as one that places a fundamental level of importance on maintaining youth and vitality even at ages in which these are all but an unrealistic try for. Accordingly, the following analysis will seek to engage the referee with a rhetorical answer to Ladsens The Natural Order as it relates to the idea of hubris. Likewise, this rhetorical response will be compared and contrasted with Joseph Epsteins essay Perpetual Adolescence. Through such a level of analysis, it is the hope of this cause that the reader will come to gain a more valuable and nuanced interpretation of why our current culture is so fixated on the idea of perpetual youthfulness and whether or not this is a positive or negative attribute. Firstly, in terms of Ladsens story, entitled The Natural Order, the author represents the internal and external dialogue that is taking place between a middle-aged married serviceman and one of his longtime best friends. The middle-aged married man is indicative of what might be termed as a conservative.